International- Frauentag 2020

ኣብ ዳርምሽታት ንቀዳም ዕለት 07.03.2020  ሰፊሕ ሰሚናር መዲብና ከምዘለና 

ንሕብር።  

Womenspic

 

ዓይነታት ዓመጽ ኣብ ልዕሊ ደቂ ኣንስትዮ

ዝምልከት ትንተናን ኣስተምህሮ ሓዘል ክቀርብ ተመዲቡ ይርከብ። ኣብዚ ሰሚናርዚ ኩሉ  ተሳታፋይ ሓሳቡን ርእይቶኡ ክህብ ንሰፊሕ ተሳትፎ  ንዕድምን ነተባብዕ።ድሕሪ ስሚናር ናይ ዕላል ምዝንጋዕ መደብ ክቅጽል ኣዩ።ንኩሉ   ዳርምሽታትን ከባቢኡን ትርከቡን/ባን ብክንሪ ንዕድም።   

 ሰሚናር ዝካየደሉ ኣዳራሽ።

Im Frauenzentrum

Emilstr, 10

64289 Darmstdt

ሰዓት :ካብ 15፡00 ክሳብ 22:00

ርእሰ-ዓንቀጽ፡ ሰዲህኤ

“6.3 ንሕሰም ህዝብና ተረዲኦምን ካብ ሰብኣዊ ርህራሄ ተበጊሶምን ዓቕሞም ብዘፍቅዶ መጠን ንኤርትራውያን ስደተኛታት ዝቕበሉን ዝናብዩን ዘለዉ ህዝብታትን መንግስታትን ሱዳንን ኢትዮጵያን፡ ብዝገበርዎ ኣቐባብላ ኣድናቖቱ ይገልጽ። ነተን ብዙሕ ኤርትራዊ ስደተኛ ዝተቐበላ ክልላት ትግራይን ዓፋርን ድማ ፍሉይ ምስጋናኡ የቕርብ። እዚ ሎሚ እዘን ክልተ ክልላት ንህዝብና ኣብ ግዜ ጸገሙ ዘርእይኦ ዘለዋ ሕውነታዊ ኣተሓሕዛ፡ ናይ ጽባሕ ኤርትራ ምስዘን ጐጎረባብታ ንዝህልዋ ጽቡቕ ዝምድና መሰረት ዘንብር ስለዝኾነ፡ ክተባባዕ ዝግብኦ ሰብኣዊ ውርሻ ምዃኑ ጉባኤ ኣረጋጊጹ።” (ካብ ውሳነታት 3ይን ሓድነታውን ጉባአ ሰዲህኤ ዝተወስደ)

ስደት ንኤርትራውያን ነዊሕ ታሪኽን ውረድ ደይብን ዘለዎ ምዃኑ ኣብ ኣእምሮ ነፍሲ ወከፍና ዘሎ እዩ። ስደት ንኤርትራውያን ካልእ መፍትሒ ምስተዓጽወ ዝውሰድ ህይወት ናይ ምድሓን ስጉምቲ እምበር ናይ ባህታ ጉዕዞ ኣይኮነን። ንኤርትራ በብተራ ዝገዝእዋ ሓይልታት፡ “ኤርትራ መሬታ እምበር ህዝባ ኣየድልየናን” ዝብል ጭረሖ ኣምሪሖም፡ ህዝባ ንብራስን ንምብስባስን ዝመረጽዎ ኣጽናቲ ስልቲ እቲ ቀንዲ ጠንቂ ስደት ኤርትራውያን ነይሩ ሕጂ ኣብ ግዝኣት ህግዲፍ እውን ኣሎ። ብፍላይ ከኣ ኣብ ከባቢ 1967 ኣብ ልዕሊ ኤርትራውያን ኣብ ዝተፈላለዩ ከባብታት ዝተወስደ ናይ ብርሰትን ምጽናትን ሓደገኛ ስጉምቲ ቀንዲ ጠንቂ ስደት ምንባሩ ብመጽናዕትታት ዝተሰነደ ዘይርሳዕ ተዘክሮ እዩ። ኤርትራውያን ስደት ንክመርጹ ዘገደዶም ኣስካሕካሒ ስጉምቲ ዝተወስዶም፡ ነቲ ንናጽነት ኤርትራ ዝካየድ ዝነበረ ቃልሲ፡ የዕጥቑ፡ የዕንግሉን ይሕብሩን እዮም ብዝብል፡፡ እቶም ተቓለስቲ ካብ ህዝቦም ነጺልካ ከም ካብ ባሕሪ ዝወጸ ዓሳ ንምስዓሮም ዝዓለመ እዩ ነይሩ።

ኤርትራውያን ግና ብደረጃ ስደተኛ ኣብ ዓዲ ጓና ምንባሮም ከይዓገቶም ነቲ ኣብ ዓዶም ኮይኖም ምእንቲ ናጽነት ኤርትራ ዘካይድዎ ዝነበሩ ቃልሲ ንኹሉ ናይ ስደት መረረት ተጻዊሮም ቀጺለምዎ እዮም። እቲ ኣዝዩ ዘሕዝን ከኣ ድሕሪቲ ዋጋ ዝኸፈልሉ ናጽነት ኤርትራ ናብ ዓዶም ብኽብሪ ተመሊሶም ጻማ ቃልሶም ኣይረኸቡን። ሕሉፍ ሓሊፎም ናይ ድሕሪ ናጽነት ሓደስቲ ኣጋይሽ ስደተኛታት ክቕበሉ እውን ተገዲዶም።

ስደት ኤርትራውያን ድሕሪ ናጽነት፡ ኣብ ክንዲ እንዳነከየ ዝኸይድ እንዳገደደ ምኻዱ ካብ ናይ ካለኦት ሃገራት ስደት ፍሉይ ዝገብሮ እዩ። ናይ ድሕሪ ናጽነት ስደት ኤርትራውያን ከምቲ ናይ ቅድም ናብ ሓደ ኣቕጣጫ ዘይኮነ፡ ናብ ብዙሕ ኩርነዓት እዩ። እቲ ቀንዲ ኣቕጣጫታት ከኣ ናብ ጐረባብቲ ሃገራት ሱዳንን ኢትዮጵያን ኮይኑ ጸኒሑ። ስደት ናብ ኢትዮጵያ ድሕሪ ውግእ ኤርትራን ኢትዮጵያን 1998-2000 እዩ ብወግዒ ብላዕለዋይ ኮሚሽን ጉዳይ ስደተኛታት ሕቡራት ሃገራት ኣፍልጦ ረኺቡ። ብቕደም ተኸተል ከኣ፡ ፍቸ፡ ብላቴ፡ ደደሳ፡ ሽመልባ፡ ማይ ዓይኒ፡ ዓዲ ሓርሽ፡ ሕንጻጽ፡ ኣሳይታን በራሕለን ኣብ ዝተባህሉ ከባብታት ኢትዮጵያ መደበራት ተኸፊቶም ብዙሓት ኤርትራውያን ኣዕቊቦም ኣለዉ።

ናይ ድሕሪ ናጽነት ስደት ኤርትራውያን፡ ብሰንኪ ዘይሕገ-መንግስታውን ዘይዲሞክራስያውን ምምሕዳር ጉጅለ ህግዲፍ ዝተፈጥረ እዩ። እቲ ጉጅለ ነቲ ዋሕዚ ንምዕጋቱ ዝመረጾ መንገዲ፡ ኣብ ኣመራርሓኡ ዘሎ ሕጽረታት ገበናትን ብምትዕርራይን ጠንቂ ስደት ብምውጋድን ዘይኮነ፡ ብሓይሊ ኣብ ዶባት እዩ ክዓግቶ ፈቲኑ። ሕሉፍ ሓሊፉ ከኣ፡ ናይ “ተኲስካ ቅተል” መምርሒ ከተግብር ስለ ዝመረጸ፡ ብዙሓት ኤርትራውያን መንእሰያት ናይዚ ጸይቂ ፖሊሲኡ ግዳይ ከም ዝኾኑ ኩልና እንፈልጦ እዩ። ኣብዚ ቀረባ መዓልታት ኣብ ከተማ መንደፈራ ኣብ ልዕሊ መንእሰይ ሸዊት ያቆብ ዝተወስደ ጭካነ ከኣ፡ ናይዚ ግፍዓዊ ተግባር ኣብነት እዩ።

ጠንቂ ስደት ኤርትራውያን እቲ ንኤርትራ ዝገዝእ ዘሎ ጉጅለ ዝፍጽሞ ዘሎ፡ ምግሃስ መሰላት፡ መጀመርታኡ እምበር መወዳእታኡ ዘይፍለጥ መጻኢ ዕድል ኤርትራዊ መንእሰይ ዘጸልመተ ግዱድ ወተሃደራዊ ኣገልግሎትን ብኣኡ ኣጐልቢብካ ዝካየድ ካብ ባርነት ፈሊኻ ዘይርአ ናይ ጉልበት ምዝመዛን ዝርከብዎም ብዙሓት ገበናት እዮም። ከም መራሒ ህግዲፍ ሃገር እናባደመት ብታሕጓስ ኣፍልቡ ዝወቅዕ ዘይኮነ፡ ዋሕዚ ናብ ስደት ክዓግት ንዝደሊ ምምሕዳር እቲ መፍትሒ ጠንቂ ስደት ካብ መሰረቱ ምድራቕ እዩ። ህግዲፍ ግና ብፖሊሲ “ኪድን ኣይትበሎ፡ ከም ዝኸይድን ግበሮ” ስለ ዝምራሕ፡ ከምስል ከጉባዕብዕ እምበር፡ ኣብቲ ጠንቂ ስደት ዋኒነይ ኢሉ ክሰርሕ ባህሪኡ ኣይፈቕደሉን እዩ። እዚ ጉጅለ ቂምን ምፍዳይ ሕነን ቀንዲ መለለይኡ ስለ ዝኾነ፡ ነቶም መሰረታዊ መፍትሒ ኮይኑ ዘይኮነስ፡ ከም ግዝያዊ መዕገሲ ስደት ዝመረጹ ኤርትራውያን ደድሕሪኦም እንዳሰዓበ ካብ ምስቓዮም ድሕር ኣይበለን። እቲ በብግዜኡ ኣብ ሱዳን ይኹን ኣብ ኢትዮጵያ ቅድሚ ሕጂ ገሊኡ ብኢድ ኣዙር ገሊኡ ከኣ ብቐጥታ፡ ከካይዶ ዝጸንሐ ቅትለትን ጭውያን ከኣ ናይቲ ጽዩፍ ተግባሩ ኣብነት እዩ።

ኣብዚ እዋንዚ ከኣ በቲ ምስ መራሒ ኢትዮጵያ ዝፈጠሮ፡ ኢደ-ወነናውን ጻሕታሪ ህውከትን ዘይቅዱስ ዝምድናኡ ኣቢሉ፡ ኣብ ልዕሊ’ቶም ኣብ ኢትዮጵያ ዘለዉ ናይ ላዕለዋይ ኮሚሽን ጉዳይ ስደተኛታት ኣፍልጦ ዘለዎም ከይተረፈ ተጽዕኖታት ክፈጥር ትንዕምንዕ ይብል ኣሎ። ንስደተኛታት ዝምልከት ዓለምና እትሰርሓሉ ዘላ ኣህጉራዊ ሕጊ ብምጥሓስ፡ ነቲ ባዕሉ ክስደድ ዝድርኾ ዘሎ ኤርትራዊ ናብ ኢትዮጵያ ኣብ ዘእትዉ ኣፍደገታት ራማ፡ ሑመራን ዛላንበሳን፡ ብላዕለዋይ ኮሚሽን ጉዳይ ስደተኛታት ሕቡራት ሃገራት ብዝተመደቡ ኢትዮጵያውያን ናይ ምምዝጋብ ሰራሕተኛታት ኣቢሉ፡ ኣብ ልዕሊ እዞም ኩነታት ኣገዲድዎም ክስደዱ ዝወሰኑ ኤርትራውያን ዝወስድ ዘሎ ንኢሳያስ ናይ ምሕጓስ ዘይሓላፍነታዊ ወስታታት ኣዝዩ ዘሕዝን እዩ። እዚ ወስታ ኣብ መጻኢ፡ ክሳብ ሕጂ ብደረጃ ስደተኛታት ዝተመዝገቡ ሕጋውያን ኤርትራውያን ኣሕሊፍካ ናብ ምሃብ ክምዕብል ከም ዝኽእል ከኣ ኣቓልቦ ዘድልዮ እዩ።

በዚ ኣጋጣሚ ስደት መሰረታዊ መፍትሒ ከምዘይኮነ ጠፊእዎም ዘይኮነስ፡ ኣብ ሃገሮም ዘጋጠሞም ጸገም ንምዕጋስ ከም ግዝያዊ መፍትሒ ብምውሳድ ናብ ኢትዮጵያ ንዝኣትዉ ኤርትራውያን ኣብዚ ዛዕባዚ ዝተዋፈሩ ኢትዮጵያውያን ሰራሕተኛታት፡ ክሓስብሉ ይግበኦም። ብዓብይኡ ከኣ መንግስቲ ኢትዮጵያ፡ ነዚ ኩሉ ዓቕሙ ጸንቂቑ ኣብ ድሮ ዘይተርፍ ውድቀቱ ዝርከብ ዘሎ ዲክታቶር ንከሕጉስ ምስቲ ዘይሓልፍ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ዘቀያይሞ መንገዲ ከይክተልን ንዓለም ለኻዊ መሰል ስደተኛ ከኽብርን ንጽወዖ። ዶ/ር ኣብይ ኣሕመድ ከኣ ከምቲ “ንውላዱ ፈትዩ፡ ንወዲ ጐረቤት ዝጸልእ፡ ነቲ ውላዱ’ውን ኣይፈትዎን’ዩ” ዝበሃል፡ ነቲ ንህዝቢ ኢትዮጵያ ዘርእይዎ ሓልዮት፡ ንህዝቢ ኤርትራ ክነፍግዎ ኣይግበኦምን።

Source: Assena

Fetsum: The Sudanese Constitutional Charter to Genuine Democracy (extension of part 1)

Fetsum: The Sudanese Constitutional Charter to Genuine Democracy (extension of part 1) Dedication: I dedicate this article to the very promising ERITREA FOCUS for its latest strategy to diffuse the dictator and democratize the nation through

Fetsum: The Sudanese Constitutional Charter to Genuine Democracy (extension of part 1)

Dedication: I dedicate this article to the very promising ERITREA FOCUS for its latest strategy to diffuse the dictator and democratize the nation through genuine transitional phase.

I strongly believe we have to rally behind this group’s strategy which I consider the most significant development as of today considering its brain power and diplomatic essence on the fundamental question of the Eritrean people.

I feel more relaxed now as a result because self- respect is something we should earn through excellence to use it as a foundation for respect from others. In the meantime, I strongly suggest that ERITREA FOCUS give maximum  attention to the Sudanese democratic journey as one of its research materials and good luck!

It seems like many Eritreans are worried about their sovereignty in the relationship between Abiy and Isaias. But this should not stop us from researching more for bright future. In my case, I am not worried as much and I know the situation is at our disposal. We can change it and that is what matters to me. I am not going to waste my time thinking about it for Democracy cannot wait because of fear and we should continue learning to achieve it through knowhow and unity. In so saying, neither does a challenge appear without impact nor can it be confronted without considering its destination. We have a challenge (dictatorship) and its inherent destination (genuine democracy); we cannot overcome the challenge to face the destination empty handed. We need to remove the dictatorship as our main challenge while simultaneously crystallizing the destination through basic knowhow. One does not have to wait for the other and both can be simultaneously executed without destructive interference. I think we have started moving forward in this regard, the latest ERITREA FOCUS’s press release being the witness to this effect.

This article is about the legalized form of the last article and my last effort on the matter. You may find it monotonous in a way but I could not help it.

Introduction: The Sudanese “Draft Constitutional Charter for the 2019 Transitional Period” disclosed on 6 August 2019 was an agreement between the Transitional Military Council and the Forces of Freedom and Change and has 16 Chapters but I will only discuss it partially in this opportunity and enjoy.

Chapter 1: General provisions

  • Repeal and Exemption

[2]      (a.) The Transitional Constitution of Sudan of 2005 and the constitutions of provinces is repealed, while the laws issued thereunder remain in force, unless they are repealed or amended.

Comment: It was not about reformation but total transformation of the system. There was a transitional constitution in 2005 whose CHAPTER II [57] says: “The tenure of office of the President of the Republic shall be five years, commencing from the date of assumption of office, and the same President may be re-elected for one more term only”. But Bashir did not allow it to be implemented until his downfall in 2019. The constitution had then to be amended to accommodate reality while partially repealed as a result. Here, the signatories disqualify the old transitional and provincial constitution keeping the laws conditionally active while open for amendment.

Chapter 2: Transitional period

[6]      (a.) The duration of the transitional period shall be 39 Gregorian months, starting from the signing of this Constitutional Charter.

  • Mandate of the Transitional Period (in compact form)

[7]  During the transitional period, state agencies perform the following duties:

(3-8)  Hold accountable members of the former regime by law, carry out legal reform, rebuild and develop the human rights and justice system, and ensure the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law, Guarantee and promote women’s rights in Sudan in all social, political, and economic fields, and combat all forms of discrimination against women. Establish mechanisms to prepare to draft a permanent constitution for the Republic of Sudan, hold a national, constitutional conference before the end of the transitional period, enact legislation related to the tasks of the transitional period.

Comment: All past transitional governments failed to answer the society’s democratic call except the current one that the world considers genuine and scientific. This transition is real and has the responsibility to legally draft the country’s permanent constitution within its legal time limit. Ours is a lot simpler because the dictator neither ratified nor changed the constitution to serve his interest unlike in the Sudanese experience where the consecutive dictators kept changing it through the years. The 1997 Constitution was produced by our best Lawyers and Social Scientists of the time and quite a few international scholars, and ratified by then people’s Assembly. All we have to do is amending it if necessary through legal procedures and utilizing it forever.

Chapter 3: Transitional period bodies

[9]  The bodies of the transitional government consist of the following: (a) The Sovereignty Council , which is the head of state and symbol of its sovereignty and unity; (b)  The Cabinet, which is the supreme, executive authority of the state; (c) The Legislative Council, which is the authority responsible for legislation and oversight over the executive’s performance.

Chapter 4: Sovereignty Council: Composition of the Sovereignty Council

[10]    (a.) The Sovereignty Council is the head of state, the symbol of its sovereignty and unity, and the Supreme Commander of the armed forces, Rapid Support Forces, and other uniformed forces. It is formed by agreement between the Transitional Military Council and the Forces of Freedom and Change.

(b.) The Sovereignty Council consists of 11 members, of whom five are civilians selected by the Forces of Freedom and Change, and five are selected by the Transitional Military Council. The eleventh member is a civilian, selected by agreement between the Transitional Military Council and the Forces of Freedom and Change.

(c ) Over the first 21 months of the transitional period, the Sovereignty Council is chaired by someone selected by the military members, and in the remaining 18 months of the transitional period, starting from ……. 2021, it is chaired by a civilian member selected by the five civilian members who were selected by the Forces of Freedom and Change.

Comment: Whatever they agreed on in the last few months (see the last article) has now become the country’s law within the transitional phase. The Sovereignty Council serves as the coordinator of the entire process behind the unified support of the people and the intellectual and professional associations of the country.  The situation necessitated a POWER SHARING arrangement between the Army and the people but they collectively decided the Council to be 100% independent of the political parties and to consist 45% (5 individuals) from the Army and 55%  (6 individuals) from the people. Yet, the Civilian side had to have a leverage over the Army by at least 10% more power and they legally assured that privilege in this grassroots based confident ride to democracy .

  • Competencies and Powers of the Sovereignty Council

[11]    (a.) The Sovereignty Council exercises the following competencies and powers:

  • (i) Appoint the Prime Minister selected by theforces of Freedom and Change;
  • (ii) Confirm the Cabinet members appointed by the Prime Minister, from a list of candidates provided by the Forces of Freedom and Change;
  • (iii)  Confirm the heads of regions or governors of provinces, according to the case, after they are appointed by the Prime Minister;
  • (iv)  Confirm the appointment of members of the Transitional Legislative Council after they are selected in accordance with the provisions of Article 23 (3) of this Charter.

Chapter 5: Transitional Cabinet

[14]    (a.) Composition of the Transitional Cabinet: The Cabinet is composed of a Prime Minister and a number of ministers not exceeding 20 from national talent of independent counsel, appointed by the Prime Minister from a list of candidates from the Forces of Freedom and Change, and confirmed by the Sovereignty Council, except for the Ministers of Defense and Interior, who is nominated by the military component of the Sovereignty Council.

(b.)  The Forces of Freedom and Change selects the Prime Minister, and he is appointed by the Sovereignty Council.

Comment: The Sudanese people have decided to go for Prime Minister and the Cabinet as the superior power in the country. This is the EXECUTIVE body of the government. Through the articles, the independent Sovereignty Council (the 11 individuals) appoints a neutral Prime Minister exclusively selected by the FFC “Forces of Freedom and Change” without the involvement of the Transitional Military Council in the government as well discussed in the last article. The Prime Minister then selects his Cabinet.

Chapter 6: Common provisions for constitutional positions

  • Financial Disclosure and Prohibition of Commercial Activities

[18]  (a.) Upon assuming their positions, members of the Sovereignty Council, Cabinet, governors or ministers of provinces or heads of regions and members of the Transitional Legislative Council submit a financial disclosure including their properties and obligations, including those of their spouses and children, in accordance with the law.

(b.) The chairman and members of the Sovereignty Council and ministers, governor and ministries of provinces or heads of regions undertake to not practice any profession or commercial or financial activity while occupying their positions. They do not receive any financial compensation, gifts, or work of any type from any non-government entity, whatever the case may be.

Comment: This is one of the most mandatory procedures in any transitional arrangement as such to avoid corruption during the transition period and that is what we have to do in our situation. They did it in many countries including Liberia and ready to do it in Sudan.

  • Prohibition on Candidacy in Elections

[19] The chairman and members of the Sovereignty Council and ministers, governors of provinces, or heads of regions, are not be entitled to run in the public elections that follow the transitional period.

Comment: All transitional government elements are restricted from running for political office in the upcoming democratic election. This is to further avoid conflict of interest in the system and to have a clean electoral committee for the democratic election ahead. They did it in many countries including Liberia and ready to do it in Sudan.

Chapter 7: Transitional Legislative Council [Assembly]

  • Composition of the Transitional Legislative Council

[23]  (a.)  The Transitional Legislative Council is an independent, legislative authority. The number of members therein shall not exceed 300 members, and it represents all forces participating in change, except for members of the National Congress and political forces that participated in the former regime until its downfall;

(b.)  The participation of women is not be less than 40% of the membership of the Transitional Legislative Council;

Comment: The 40% translates to guaranteed 120 sits at minimum but still offers unlimited opportunity for women in the most important branch of the government. Gender equality was guaranteed to certain extent by that many women in the Assembly but to full extent considering the open ended opportunity in the clause. We need to empower our women as such to have a decent and prosperous society in our country.

(c.)  67% of the members of the Transitional Legislative Council are selected by the Forces of Freedom and Change, and 33% are selected by other forces who did not sign the Freedom and Change Declaration. The appointments take place and the percentages of each force are determined in consultation between the Forces of Freedom and Change and the military members of the Sovereignty Council; 

Comment:  Most of the Sudanese opposition forces had signed the Declaration with the exception of few that I did not find important to research for this discussion. But Sudan has about 20 political parties where few of them signed the document. I am not sure here but part of the 33% of the Legislative Council could have been assigned to the political parties which is normal in a situation as such; a part of it given to the other portion of the society that did not sign the document. In any case, the people at minimum occupy 67% of the sits in the parliament in this situation without other sits in the rest of the council (out of the 33% sits).

Chapter 8: I have avoided many case laws so far but Chapter 8 deals with the formation of the independent Judiciary Council.

Chapter 9:

[47] Equality before the law

People are equal before the law, and have the right to the protection of the law without discrimination between them because of ethnicity, color, gender, language, religious faith, political opinion, racial or ethnic origin, or any other reason.

[55]  Freedom of belief and worship

Every person shall have the right to freedom of religious belief and worship. They shall have the right to profess or express their religion or belief through worship, education, practice, performance of rituals, or celebrations, in accordance with the requirements of the law and public order. No one shall be compelled to convert to a religion they do not believe in or to practices rites or rituals they do not voluntarily accept.

Comment: People have the freedom to worship, educate and learn, practice, perform rituals and celebrations related to their beliefs but “in accordance with the requirements of the law and public order”. The freedom given in [55] is not out of the control of the regime and so cannot be used to politicize them in the country. Believers must respect law and order to enjoy their belief and worship because freedom comes with responsibility directed towards the benefit of a society as a unit (peaceful coexistence, nationalism, territorial integrity and equality, etc.). in my opinion, the clauses manifest the emergence of secular democracy in Sudan; the separation of religion from politics, which I think signifies the end of Sharia and other religious means of politically controlling the people.

[57]  Freedom of assembly and organization

(a.)  The right to peaceful assembly shall be guaranteed, and every person shall have the right to free organization without others, including the right to form political parties, associations, organizations, syndicates and professional unions, or the join the same in order to protect their interests.

(b.)  The law shall regulate the formation and registration of political parties, associations, organizations, syndicates and professional unions, in accordance with what is required by democratic society.

(c.)  No organization shall have the right to work as a political party, unless it has the following:

(i) Open membership for all Sudanese, regardless of religion, ethnic origin or place of birth;

(ii) Democratically elected institutions;

(iii) Transparent and open sources of funding.

[58] The right to political participation

Every citizen has the right to political participation in public affairs, as regulated by law.

Comment: The 22 political parties in the country and new political parties must respect the laws associated with Chapter 9 [57]. The upcoming Independent Election Commission is expected to crystalize the preliminary clauses in here  but they suggest the minimum requirements for political party qualification in the country.

In our case, there were 13 organizations including the liberation movements (Kunama and Afar) listed as members of EDA (Eritrean Democratic Alliance) in 2008. We shall see what happens but it is clear that we cannot accommodate ethnic and religious political parties like many other societies in the classification. The subject in relation to the people vis-à-vis political parties is clear but some kind of agreement has to be reached between the people and our liberation fronts with maximum concern and respect for us to make it together to the end. There is no doubt genuine democracy that empowers our minorities should help the unity built on trust and nationalism.

Chapter 16: Miscellaneous provisions

[70] (b.)  The Transitional Military Council [TMC] shall be dissolved once the constitutional oath is sworn by the members of the Sovereignty Council.

Comment: With this case law, the 5 members of the government from the Army (TMC) are legally conditioned to melt into the people and they did after they took the oath on 17th  August 2019. The African Union Commission Chairperson Moussa Faki Mahamat, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, and representatives from Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, President Kenyata of Kenya, President Salva Kiir (South Sudan), President Idriss Deby Itno (Chad) and President Faustin-Archange Touadéra (Central African Republic), attended the ceremony. The parasite was hibernating in Adi Hallo singing the blues by then when President Kenyatta said “the nation’s structure of government should reflect its heterogeneity to guarantee inclusion for all [and that] a peaceful and united Sudan is in the best interest of the region and the whole of Africa”.

In conclusion, the Sudanese style of democratizing the country is indeed in “the best interest of the region and the whole of Africa”. The situation will greatly influence our region for the better. It will be impossible for Isaias to continue his absolute dictatorship without a good partner to that end. Abiy is just a survivor that deals with him in fear of the Weyanes and may be in dreaming state about our ports but he played a good role in Sudan, meaning that he is potentially part of the democratic environment in the region. Being in the middle of Democracies in Kenya, Somalia (excluding the Alshabab effect), Ethiopia, Djibouti and Sudan should then feel like swimming in the ocean with no land in sight for that paranoid dictator with thick mustache under his nose (symbol of dictatorship in a way (Hitler Sadam, Bashir, etc.). No one can rely on him as a strategic ally in the near future. Even that privilege is becoming very hard for him to sustain. In short, there is no better regional situation for us to change the situation and everything will change if we change the way we do things.

To wrap it up, the nature of transition to democracy is known to many societies on planet earth and we can keep on discussing a nation at a time to that effect. But I believe Liberia’s and Sudan’s experience would be enough to give us the head start towards the basic knowledge of the matter so we can confidently apply it in the very near future. This article completes my thesis on Transitional Government leaving the best of the subject for ERITREA FOCUS to deal with.  Thank you and good luck.

Source: Al-Jazeera

Abraham T Zereby Abraham T Zere

On January 31, US President Donald Trump expanded his controversial travel ban to include Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Sudan, Tanzania and Nigeria [Reuters]

On January 31, US President Donald Trump expanded his controversial travel ban to include Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Sudan, Tanzania and Nigeria [Reuters]

MORE ON ERITREA

On January 31, US President Donald Trump expanded his controversial travel ban to include six additional countries, including my home country, Eritrea.

Reportedly, Eritrea was included in the ban for three reasons: the Eritrean government's lack of cooperation with the US in its efforts to remove Eritrean nationals living in the country without proper documentation; widespread visa overstays by Eritrean nationals; and the African country's inability to comply with the US information-sharing criteria on matters of national security and safety. 

The decision was a devastating blow for thousands of already beleaguered Eritreans. Without the possibility of seeking safety in the US, they are now left to make an impossible choice between embarking on a deadly journey towards an unwelcoming Europe, facing gross abuses in Sudan, shuttered opportunities in Ethiopia, or tolerating what passes for life in the open-air prison that is Eritrea. 

By expanding its travel ban to include Eritrean nationals, the US not only condemned thousands of innocent people to a life of oppression, uncertainty and pain, but it also signalled that it would do nothing to censor their oppressors.

Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Chad Wolf said the ban would see the United States suspend the issuance of visas that can lead to permanent residency for nationals of affected countries, but would not hinder the issuance of non-immigrant visas, such as those given to tourists, students and businesspeople.

Eritrea does not issue passports to its citizens except for in extraordinary circumstances, and most Eritreans who manage to leave the country only have refugee travel documents. This means there is almost no chance for them to score a non-immigrant visa and enter the US.

The perpetrators of repression in Eritrea, who hold official passports, however, will almost certainly be unaffected by the new travel restrictions. Politicians, military leaders and other supporters of the regime who are wreaking havoc in the country will continue to travel to the US whenever they need and want to conduct seminars, attend meetings, give music concerts, collect donations and even enjoy holidays. The new travel ban also spares holders of diplomatic passports, which means the Eritrean diplomats will be allowed to continue visiting the US and delivering their vicious propaganda. Ordinary Eritreans who have been forced to escape their homes due to the regime's flawed policies, however, will continue to suffer.

In response to the travel ban, the Eritrean Ministry of Information issued a statement, indicating that while they have no problem with the newly introduced travel restrictions on their citizens, they are disappointed with the reasoning behind them.

The government of Eritrea "has consistently opposed 'automatic asylum' and other misguided measures invoked by certain countries in the past 20 years for ulterior reasons of 'strategic depopulation' against Eritrea", the statement said, adding that it had lodged protests against previous US administrations that followed similar asylum policies. But it nevertheless criticised the Trump administration's travel ban, only because the ban does not appear to stem from the concerns repeatedly voiced by the Eritrean government, and hence sends a "negative signal" to the Eritrean leadership.

The statement all-but-proved that the Eritrean government has no intention of negotiating with the US government to help reinstate its citizens' right to travel and immigrate to the US.

Now, many Eritrean citizens' only hope is that regional powers who have strong relations with the Trump administration, such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, will intervene to help Eritreans, as they have previously done by helping lift UN sanctions on Eritrea. Without such help, Eritreans will continue to be punished both by their own government and the governments of countries that they seek asylum in, simply for the misfortune of being born in Eritrea.

Escaping repression, not posing a threat

Trump's travel ban implies that Eritrean immigrants pose a threat to the US government and its people. This, of course, could not be further from the truth. Over the years, Eritrean immigrants made invaluable contributions to American society.

Many Eritrean-American artists made significant contributions to the US cultural scene, such as Tiffany Haddish and Nipsey Hussle, whose fathers fled from war and settled in the US. Olympian medalist and "one of the most accomplished distance runners in American history," Mebrahtom "Meb" Kiflezghi, was born in Eritrea to Eritrean parents. Haben Girma, the first deaf and blind person to graduate from Harvard, who was named "White House Champion of Change" by President Obama, was born to Eritrean parents who fled war. The list of influential Americans of Eritrean origin also includes Dr Haile Debas, who was once described as a "one person transformer for global health in California, at UCSF, in America, and around the world." Colorado Congressman Joe Neguse, who has condemned the travel ban, is also the son of Eritrean immigrants.

One may argue that while Eritrean immigrants are clearly not a threat to the US, they should still be banned because they ignore US laws by overwhelmingly overstaying their visas. It is true that Eritrean immigrants are more likely than immigrants from other nations to violate their visa conditions: Overall only 1.9 percent of visitors to the US overstay their visas, while the rate among Eritrean visitors is 24 percent. But before making a judgement, it is necessary to ask some important questions: Who are these Eritreans who have overstayed their visas and why did they do so?

I can easily provide examples: I overstayed my visa. My sister, who is now a registered nurse in California, did, too. My younger brother, who is now a software engineer in the Silicon Valley, also did the same. Why did we overstay? Because we had no other option. Staying in the US was our only chance to escape repression. If we returned home when our visas expired, we'd be thrown into a dungeon. The fact that most Eritreans who overstay their visas are eventually granted asylum should be seen as confirmation that they have legitimate reasons to do so.

Caught up in indefinite transit

Since 2010, 17,564 Eritreans have resettled in the US as refugees according to the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration.

As mentioned before, the Eritrean state rarely issues passports to its citizens and allows them to leave the country officially. As a result, almost all Eritreans who were lucky enough to resettle in the US have many family members who have been stranded in Eritrea. The dreams of all these people of one day reuniting with their relatives in the US have been crushed by the Trump administration's new extended travel ban.

The 2018 peace deal with Ethiopia and the resulting easing of border restrictions had renewed many Eritreans' hopes for leaving the country and joining their loved ones in the West. The US's very long and convoluted vetting process for issuing family reunification visas, however, made this almost impossible for many. As the US embassy in Asmara stopped issuing immigrant visas, many who want to immigrate to the US moved to neighbouring countries to complete the process. Now, they are stranded in limbo indefinitely, as they do not want to return to Eritrea and continue living under unbearable oppression.

Trump's travel ban also devastated Eritrean nationals in the US, like me, who were hoping to be reunited with their family members. As they do not have a government acting on their behalf and fighting for their rights, they do not know where to seek help. Following the announcement of the extended ban, I have no idea when and if I will be able to see my mother, who is still in Eritrea, again.

While facing tremendous external challenges, the Eritrean regime seems to care very little about improving conditions inside the country, something that's been the case for a very long time. Eritreans continue to flee their country at an alarming rate. Those left in the country face mounting challenges with little hope for improvement or redress.

I thought I had escaped from a repressive regime that retaliates against families for others' perceived wrongdoing. Yet, the sad, familiar story has followed me and many of my countrymen/women. Now I must figure out how to explain to my daughter and nieces - who are Americans - why their government banned them from seeing their grandparents

ካልኣይ ክፋል

ብብርሃነ ኣብርሃ

ቲቪ ኤረ ነቲ ምስ ፕረሲደንት ኢሳያስ ኣፍወርቂ ዝገበሮ ቃለ-መሓትት ብ7 ለካቲት 2020 ዓ.ም ከምዝዘርግሖ ዝዝከር ኢዩ። እዚ ኣብ ክንዲ ብዘቤታዊ ብናይ ግዳም ወይ ብዞባዊ ደረጃ ዝጀመረ ቃለ-መሓትት ከም ቀዳማይ ኣጀንዳኡ ዘልዓሎ፡ ጕዳይ ዶብ፡ ጕዳይ ባድመን ጕዳይ ህዝባዊ ወያነ ሓርነት ትግራይን (ህወሓት) ምንባሩ እውን ዝዝከር ኢዩ።

ፕረሲደንት ኢሳያስ ኣፍወርቂ፡ ጠንቂ ናይ ውግእ ኤርትራን ኢትዮጵያን ናይ ዶብ ወይ ናይ ባድመ ዘይኰነስ፣ ናይ ወያነ ጸቢብ ኣተሓሳስባ ብሓፈሻ፡ እቲ መሰል ርእሰ-ውሳኔ ክሳብ ምግንጻል ዝብልን ኣብ ኤቲንክ ዝተሰረተ ፈደራላዊ ስርዓትን ዝብል ስነ-ሓሳብን ድማ ብፍላይ ምዃኑ ክገልጽ ተሰሚዑ። እዚ ቅድሚ ሕጂ ሰሚዕዮ ዘይፈልጥ ሓድሽ ጠንቂ፡ ሓድሽ ክስን ሓድሽ ምስምስን ኢዩ።

እቲ ብ1998-2000 ኣብ መንጐ ኤርትራን ኢትዮጵያን ዝተባርዐ ውግእ፡ ጠንቁ ወያነ ንባድመ ምውራሩ፡ 6 ሓለፍቲ ሰራዊት ኤርትራ ክዛተዩ ኢሎም ምስ ከዱ ምቕታሎም፡ ሰራዊት ኢትዮጵያ ንልዑላውነት ኤርትራ ጥሒሶም ዓዲ ምሩግ ምእታዎም …ወዘተ ዝብል ኢዩ ንህዝቢ ኤርትራ ክንገሮ ዝጸንሐ።

እዚ፡ ከም ነፋሒቶ ኣብ ዝዓለበሉ ሕብሪ ዝቀያይር ውልቀ-መላኺ፡ ብ1992 ዓ.ም ኣብ ኢትዮጵያ ኣብ ዝተኻየደ መሰጋገሪ ኮንፈረንስ፡ …እዚ ኮንፈረንስ’ዚ፡ ነቲ ክሳብ ሕጂ ብገዛእቲ ሓይልታት ኢትዮጵያ ዘይተራእየን ዘይተዘርበሉን ጕዳይ ብሄራትን ጕዳይ ርእሰ-ውሳኔ ኤርትራን ኣልዒሉ ምዝርራቡን መፍትሒ ምግባሩን ዓቢ ለውጢ ኢዩ ክብል ናእዳኡን ኣድናቆቱን ገሊጹ ምንባሩ ዝዝከር ኢዩ። ካብ’ዚ ሓሊፉ፡ ኣካል ናይ’ቲ ሽዑ ዝቐውም ዝነበረ መሰጋገሪ መንግስቲ ኢትዮጵያ ክኸውን ድሌት ከምዝነበሮ እውን ሎምስ ኣሉታ ክህበሉ ዘይክእል ጽሓይ ዝወቕዖ ሓቂ ኰይኑ ኢዩ።

ኣብ ርእስ’ዚ፡ ብ1981 ዓ.ም ህዝባዊ ግንባር ምስ ህወሓት ብምትሕብባር ኣብ ልዕሊ ተሓኤ መጥቃዕቲ ከካይዱ ከለዉኸ፡ ህወሓት ንናጽነት ናይ ትግራይ ዝቃለስ ውድብ’ዶ ኣይኰነን ነይሩ? ህዝባዊ ግንባር ምስ ህወሓት ተሓባቢሩ፡ ንሰራዊት ደርግ ካብ ኤርትራን ኢትዮጵያን ክጸራርግ እንከሎ፡ ህወሓት ዝኽተሎ ስነ-ሓሳብ እቲ ብ1987 ዝሓንጸጾ ፕሮግራሙ’ዶ ኣይነበረን። ከምኡ’ውን፡ ግንባር ሓርነት ኦሮሞ (ኦነግ) ንናጽነት ናይ ህዝቢ ኦሮሞ ዝቃለስ ውድብ ምዃኑ፡ ዘይፈልጥ ኤርትራዊ ይኹን ኢትዮጵያዊ ዘሎ ኣይመስለንን። ህዝባዊ ግንባር ድማ፡ ካብ ሰብዓታት ኣትሒዙ ክሳብ ትማሊ ቀዳማይ ሚኒስተር ኣብዪ ኣሕመድ ኣብ ስልጣን ዝመጽእ ንግንባር ሓርነት ኦሮም (ኦነግ) ኵሉ መዳያዊ ደገፍ ክገብረሉ ምጽናሑ ዝፍለጥ ኢዩ። እቲ ንህወሓት መዀነኒ፡ እቲ ኣብ መትከል ርእሰ-ውሳኔ ክሳብ ምግንጻል ምእማን ወይ ንዓንቀጽ 39 ኣብ ቅዋም ኢትዮጵያ ምቕባል እንተዀይኑ፡ ኦነግ እውን ክዅነን ኣይግብኦን ድዩ!!!?

ናይ ኢትዮጵያ ቅዋም፡ ዝቕበልዎን ዝጻረርዎን ኢትዮጵያውያን ምህላዎም ኵልና ንከታተሎ ዘሎና ጕዳይ ኢዩ። ኣብ ኤትኒካዊ ፍልልይ ዝተሰረተ ፈደራላዊ ስርዓት ዝድግፉ ኢትዮጵያውያን ካብ ኵሉ ብሄራት ኣለዉ። ንሓንቲ ኢትዮጵያ ዝብሉ እውን ከምኡ። ስለ’ዚ፡ ንወያነ ፈሊኻ ከተጥቅዕ ምፍታን፡ ካብ ቂምን ቅርሕንትን ዝተበገሰ፡ ሸርሒ ምዃኑ ዝሰሓት ኣይኰነን።

እቲ ዝያዳ ሓደገኛ ግን፡ ስርዓት ኢሳያስ፡ ኣብ ውሽጣዊ ጕዳያት ናይ ኢትዮጵያ ኣትዩ፡ እዚ ይሕሸኹም እዚ’ባ ክብል ምፍታኑ ኢዩ። ነዚ ድማ ተሓቢኡ ዘይኰነስ፡ ብጋህዲ ኢዩ ዝዛረቦ ዘሎ። እቲ ሓደጋታት ናይ’ዚ ስነ-ሓሳብ ካብ ንኤርትራ ንኢትዮጵያ ኢዩ ብዝያዳ ንሓደጋ ምብትታን ዘቃልዓ ዘሎ። ኣብ ኢትዮጵያ ዝፍጠር ምብትታን ንኤርትራ እውን ሓደገኛ ስለዝዀነ፡ ምስ መንግስቲ ኣብዪ ኣሕመድ ምሕዝነት ፈጢርና ክንሰርሕ ኣሎና። ጕዳይ ዶብ ሕጂ ካልኣይ ቦታ ዝሕዝ ንእሽቶ ጕዳይ ኢዩ ብምባል ንህዝቢ ኤርትራ ሓባቢሉ ካብ ሕቶ ልዑላውነቱ ክኣልዮን ኣብ ዳግማይ ውግእ ክሸሞን ኢዩ ዝፍትን ዘሎ። ኣብ’ዚ ወርሒ’ዚ፡ ኣብ መንጐ መራሕቲ ክልቲኡ ሃገራት ዝርከብዎን ናይ ኢትዮጵያ ሚኒስተር መከላኸሊ፡ ኦቦ ለማ መገርሳ ዝተሳተፎን ኣኼባ ኣብ ኣስመራ ምክያዱ ነዚ መደብ’ዚ ዝእምት ርክብ’ዩ።

ጐንጺ አርትራን ኢትዮጵያን ናይ ዶብ ጐነጽ’ዩ ተባሂሉ፡ ናብ ኣህጕራዊ ቤት ፍርዲ ቀሪቡ፡ ናይ መወዳእታን ቀያድን ብይን ተዋሂብሉ ኢዩ። በዚ ብይን’ዚ መሰረት ባድመ ናይ ኤርትራ ምዃና ተረጋጊጹ ኣሎ። ስርዓት ኢሳያስ ድማ፡ ናይ ዶብ ውግእ ብምጅማሩ ኤርትራ ካሕሳ ክትከፍል ተወሲኑላ ኢዩ። ሕጂ ኣብ ጓል ነገር ብምኻድ ንልዑላውነት ኤርትራ ኣብ ዋጋ ዕዳጋ ምእታው ዘይኰነ፡ ነቲ ብይን ከምዝትግበር ምግባር ኢዩ ዝድለ። ሕጂ ነዚ ብይን’ዚ ክትግብር ሓላፍነት ዘለዎ ድማ ወያነ ዘይኰነ፡ እቲ ስልጣን ፈደራላዊ መንግስቲ ጨቢጡ ዘሎ ብዶር. ኣብዪ ኣሕመድ ዝምራሕ ኣካል ኢዩ። ንሱ’ዩ ተሓታቲ፡ ንሱ’ዩ ነቲ ውሳኔ ብዘይ ቅድመ-ኵነት ኣብ ግብሪ ከውዕሎ ኢየ ዝበለ።

ይቕጽል…….

February 13, 2020 News

For some time now it has been clear that Eritreans are finding it increasingly difficult to escape the dictatorship and make and new life for themselves by travelling to Europe.

Once this was possible. But the evidence is mounting that Eritrean refugees find the route blocked. Some are trapped in extremely dangerous detention centres in Libya, but overall the flow of asylum seekers is drying up.

These statistics are from Frontex – the EU’s official border guards.

They are for the numbers using what Frontex calls the Central Mediterranean Route

2015        2016         2017        2018

38,791     20,721      7,055       3,529

The figure for 2018 is one tenth of what it was just four years earlier.

The UN refugee agency, UNHCR, produced data which bears out this trend.

It can be seen here.

Screenshot 2020-02-13 at 11.21.01

Screenshot 2020-02-13 at 11.21.38

This is a trend that has been developing since 2016 – if not earlier.

Lower numbers are leaving Eritrea

Eritrea has been described as one of the world’s fastest emptying nations. The widely quoted estimate – first stated by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea in 2012 – is that 4,000 to 5,000 Eritreans are leaving their country every month. Since then, this number has been quoted in numerous articles and reports. This includes a 2014 study by the RMMS, which tried to shed more light on this estimate by exploring the ‘ jigsaw’ of numbers from different sources and concluded that, although plausible, the number could be slightly overestimated.

One explanation for the lower number of Eritrean arrivals in Italy in 2016, could be that indeed lower numbers have been leaving Eritrea in 2016 compared to the years before. Earlier in 2016, RMMS reported on a deterioration of the living conditions in Eritrea. Reduced purchasing power and reduced access to cash from remittance flows could have limited the ability of many to fund migration.

As I warned three years ago: Europe’s “wall” across the Mediterranean is almost complete.

Thursday, 13 February 2020 20:34

Radio dimtsi Harnnet Kassel 13.02.2020

Written by